Skip to main content

Grame Godlsworthy - notes taken from his book - PREACHING THE WHOLE BIBLE AS CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURE

Lately some other pastors and I have been reading through a book together. We get together once a month to discuss about 3 chapters from that book around some food. Of course there is food involved! We're pastors and pastors can do some eating; especially Brian Sandifer. ;) 

Over the period of about two hours we talk about what we have gleamed from this encouraging book. 

Here is the first post of many to come about this great book by Grame Goldsworthy.




Concerning the mandate to preach-

“We believe that preaching is not some peripheral item in the program of the local church, but that it lies at the very heart of what it is to be the people of God. We understand the activity of preaching as the primary way in which the congregations of God’s people express their submission to God”



Taken from- Preaching the Whole Bible as Christian Scripture; page 1. 

Concerning the reduction to moralism of the OT in preaching-

"The message of the Old Testament is too easily reduced to the imitation of godly example and the avoidance of the ungodly example.  This raises the questions of the Bible's unity, the relationship of the Testaments. (page 5)

"Jesus is presented in the New Testament as the one who fulfills the promises of God by achieving for humankind the salvation that is i otherwise beyond our reach. Against the backdrop of the complexity of the history and prophetic expectations of the Old Testament, Jesus proclaims himself to be the goal of all the purposes and promises of God.  Where the Old Testament describes the goal of God's work in terms of a remnant of the chosen people, the promised land, the temple, the David prince, and a whole range of images and metaphors, the New Testament claims simply that the death and resurrection of Jesus fulfills them all. The mighty acts of God, interpreted by his prophetic word, and by which he revealed his nature, are declared by the preaching of Jesus and his apostles to be preparatory for the person and work of Jesus. The God who acts in the Old Testament is the God who becomes flesh in the New Testament in order to achieve the definitive saving work in the world." 

Taken from- Preaching the Whole Bible as Christian Scripture; page 6.


Concerning the Bible's main subject- 

"The principle is simply this: Jesus says that the Old Testament is a book about him. ... How does this passage of Scripture, and consequently my sermon, testify to Christ? There are two man grounds for this question. The first, as stated above, is that Jesus claims to be the subject of all Scripture. The second is the overall structure of the biblical revelation, which finds its coherence only in the person and work of Christ." 

Taken from- Preaching the Whole Bible as Christian Scripture; page 21. 



Goldsworthy is an Australian Anglican and Old Testament scholar. Now retired, Goldsworthy was formerly lecturer in Old Testament, biblical theology and hermeneutics at Moore Theological College in Sydney, Australia. He is the author of According to Plan (IVP, 1991) and Preaching the Whole Bible as Christian Scripture (Eerdmans, 2000). Goldsworthy has an MA from Cambridge University and a ThM and PhD from Union Theological Seminary in Virginia.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

John Stott on the "old man" and the "body ruled by sin" in Rom 6 v 6

  There are, in fact, two quite distinct ways in which the New Testament speaks of crucifixion in relation to holiness. The first is our death to sin through identification with Christ; the second is our death to self through imitation of Christ.  On the one hand, we have been crucified with Christ. But on the other we have crucified (decisively repudiated) our sinful nature with all its desires, so that every day we renew this attitude by taking up our cross and following Christ to crucifixion.  The first is a legal death, a death to the penalty of sin; the second is a moral death, a death to the power of sin.  The first belongs to the past, and is unique and unrepeatable; the second belongs to the present, and is repeatable, even continuous. I died to sin (in Christ) once; I die to self (like Christ) daily. It is with the first of these two deaths that Romans 6 is chiefly concerned, although the first is with a view to the second, and the second cannot take place w...

Boice: “... the federal way of dealing with us was actually the fairest and kindest of all the ways God could have operated. ”

  Adam had been appointed by God to be the representative of the race so that if he stood, we too would stand, and if he fell, we would fall with him. Adam did fall, as we know.  So death passed upon everyone. “But isn’t that terribly unfair?” someone protests. “Isn’t it cruel for God to act in this fashion?” ... the federal way of dealing with us was actually the fairest and kindest of all the ways God could have operated.  Besides, it was the only way it would later be possible for God to save us once we had sinned. In other words, federalism is actually a proof of God’s grace, which is the point the passage comes to (vv. 15 ff.). It was gracious to Adam first of all. Why? Because it was a deterrent to his sin. God must have explained to Adam that he was to represent his posterity. That might have restrained him from sinning. A father who might be tempted to steal his employer’s funds (and would if only he himself were involved), might well decide not to do it if he kne...

Repackaging the gospel? It's more like obscuring the gospel!

Preface : I recognize this post may make me unpopular with some, but I think it is an important issue to blog about here.  I’ve had time to reflect on this video and in my opinion, I think what is in this video raises some questions.  This gentleman featured below is slotted to speak at the SBC's 2020 Pastors' Conference and it prompted me to think more about this illustration.  I want to note that I don't know him and I have no personal issue with him.   I assume he is a brother in the LORD.  Having said that, I see some significant issues here that relate to this type of preaching being clear on the gospel of Jesus Christ. In fact, it appears to be obscuring it in my observation. Concern:  Should the SBC or churches, in general, be in the habit of holding this up as a  good and healthy example?  Let's think about it some together.  (Watch this clip below here first.) Context:  The clip was posted to stand on its own a...