Skip to main content

Chuck Lawless: 9 REASONS GOSSIP IS DESTRUCTIVE TO A CHURCH

By

Gossip is not common only among those who sow discord in the church. No, we all can fall into this sin. Why? Because pride must always be put to death. While it is painfully true that some are more bent this way than others, especially when they do not get what they want, we all have to see the subtle danger of gossip.


Regardless our frustrations, we must not participate in gossip. Chuck Lawless has 9 observations here to remind about why we must turn from this and confront it when it comes into our lives. 



It is prideful for us to gossip and to listen to gossip too. Let's not do that. Let's do what would please Jesus. 





9 REASONS GOSSIP IS DESTRUCTIVE TO A CHURCH 
via Chuck Lawless

Gossip Destroys
It's both a verb and a noun. We've certainly all heard it, and perhaps we've all done it. Maybe we've even been the butt of it.
"It" is gossip – and it's destructive to a church. Here's why:
1.      It's evil. How else would you describe an act that's so often included among lists of sinful acts in scripture (Rom 1:29, 2 Cor 12:20, 1 Tim 5:13)? In fact, "gossip" is sometimes included as a marker of lostness – not Christianity.
2.      It's idolatrous. Gossips love having information, even if it's wrong and harmful. They even get angry if others have information they don't have. Having "the dirt" becomes their god – and that's idolatry.
3.      It's self-centered. Those who gossip put themselves in the middle of everything. And, if they're not in the middle, they talk about those who are so they draw attention back to themselves.
4.      It's divisive. Talking about other people behind their backs never promotes unity, especially when the conversations take place in the back room or the parking lot. 

5.      It's often deceptive. Sometimes the "reported" information is cloaked in a prayer request ("now I don't want to spread rumors, but we need to pray for _________ because ________"). That's gossip, and it's a lie to call it anything else.
6.      It harms reputations. It takes only one rumor to harm a brother or sister, and it's tough to recover once the rumor's out. We only weaken the family of God through gossip.  
7.      It destroys trust. Here's where gossips are often so focused on spreading their news that they miss their own foolishness. Gossips may be trying to hurt others, but what they prove is only that they themselves are completely untrustworthy.
8.      It indicates hypocrisy in the church. James puts it this way: the tongue is a "world of unrighteousness" (3:6), a "restless evil, full of deadly poison" (3:8). When the same tongue blesses God and curses others—including through gossip—hypocrisy is in the room (3:10-12).
9.      It risks God's judgment. Jesus told us that we'll answer for every word we say (Matthew 12:36-37). Gossips who continue in their pattern (and most gossips do) are inviting judgment – and judgment on one member affects the entire church. 
So, what do we do? If you're a gossip, stop talking. If you like to hear gossip, you're also guilty. Stop listening. And, if gossips continue to talk and create turmoil, it's only loving to confront them and call them to repentance. To do anything less is to give the enemy a foothold in your church.

--

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

John Stott on the "old man" and the "body ruled by sin" in Rom 6 v 6

By
  There are, in fact, two quite distinct ways in which the New Testament speaks of crucifixion in relation to holiness. The first is our death to sin through identification with Christ; the second is our death to self through imitation of Christ.  On the one hand, we have been crucified with Christ. But on the other we have crucified (decisively repudiated) our sinful nature with all its desires, so that every day we renew this attitude by taking up our cross and following Christ to crucifixion.  The first is a legal death, a death to the penalty of sin; the second is a moral death, a death to the power of sin.  The first belongs to the past, and is unique and unrepeatable; the second belongs to the present, and is repeatable, even continuous. I died to sin (in Christ) once; I die to self (like Christ) daily. It is with the first of these two deaths that Romans 6 is chiefly concerned, although the first is with a view to the second, and the second cannot take place w...
Post a Comment
Read more

Berkoff: "The law was not substituted for the promise; neither was faith supplanted by works. "

By
  The giving of the law did not effect a fundamental change in the religion of Israel, but merely introduced a change in its external form.  The law was not substituted for the promise; neither was faith supplanted by works.  Many of the Israelites, indeed, looked upon the law in a purely legalistic spirit and sought to base their claim to salvation on a scrupulous fulfillment of it as a body of external precepts.  But in the case of those who understood its real nature, who felt the inwardness and spirituality of the law, it served to deepen the sense of sin and to sharpen the conviction that salvation could be expected only from the grace of God . L. Berkhof, Systematic Theology (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans publishing co., 1938), 498–499.
Post a Comment
Read more

F.F. Bruce: ...know their father's will...

By
The NT does not contain a detailed code of rules for the Christian. Codes of rules, as Paul explains elsewhere, are suited to the period of immaturity when the children of God are still under guardians; but children who have come to years of responsibility know their father’s will without having to be provided with a long list of “Do’s” and “Don’t’s.” What the NT does provide is those basic principles of Christian living which may be applied to varying situations of life as they arise. So, after answering the Corinthian Christians’ question about the eating of food that has been offered to idols, Paul sums up his advice in the words: “whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God” (1 Cor. 10:31). Phrases current in worship, like “to the glory of God” or (as here) “in the name of the Lord Jesus,” were given a practical relevance by being applied to the concerns of ordinary life. Bruce, F. F. (1984). The Epistles to the Colossians, to Philemon, and to the...
Post a Comment
Read more