Schreiner:Jesus demonstrates his deity by proclaiming what will happen before it occurs.

Jesus predicts what will happen in advance so that his disciples will believe egō eimi, “I am” (John 13:19 my translation). The use of “I am” demonstrates that such predictions are not merely the prophecies of an ordinary prophet. Jesus demonstrates his deity by proclaiming what will happen before it occurs. We have already noted that the “I am” formula is common in Isa. 40–48. These same chapters often declare that Yahweh stands apart from idols as the true God because he is able to predict the future (Isa. 41:21–29; 42:8–9; 44:8–9; 46:9–11; 48:6).

The uniqueness of Yahweh manifests itself in his control over history. So too, Jesus is revealed as “I am” in his ability to predict the future. The deity of Jesus is suggested also by his words to those arresting him: “I am” (John 18:5, 6, 8 my translation). The text could be read in terms of simple self-identification, but since those who arrest Jesus fall to the ground at his self-revelation, we should read the declaration in light of the other “I am” statements.

Human beings are stunned and fall back in the presence of the divine, so what happened here is a kind of theophany. So too the Isaianic background is likely present when Jesus predicted the future before it occurs, demonstrating that “I am” (John 13:19 my translation). In Isaiah the true God differentiates himself from idols, which are powerless to predict the future, and here Jesus identified himself as divine, but the next verse (John 13:20) indicates that he does not act independently of the Father but rather has been sent by the Father himself, so that the unity between the Father and the Son is emphasized.

Schreiner, T. R. (2008). New Testament theology: magnifying God in Christ (p. 253). Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.

Comments

John Stott on the "old man" and the "body ruled by sin" in Rom 6 v 6

There are, in fact, two quite distinct ways in which the New Testament speaks of crucifixion in relation to holiness. The first is our death to sin through identification with Christ; the second is our death to self through imitation of Christ. On the one hand, we have been crucified with Christ. But on the other we have crucified (decisively repudiated) our sinful nature with all its desires, so that every day we renew this attitude by taking up our cross and following Christ to crucifixion. The first is a legal death, a death to the penalty of sin; the second is a moral death, a death to the power of sin. The first belongs to the past, and is unique and unrepeatable; the second belongs to the present, and is repeatable, even continuous. I died to sin (in Christ) once; I die to self (like Christ) daily. It is with the first of these two deaths that Romans 6 is chiefly concerned, although the first is with a view to the second, and the second cannot take place w...

Berkoff: "The law was not substituted for the promise; neither was faith supplanted by works. "

The giving of the law did not effect a fundamental change in the religion of Israel, but merely introduced a change in its external form. The law was not substituted for the promise; neither was faith supplanted by works. Many of the Israelites, indeed, looked upon the law in a purely legalistic spirit and sought to base their claim to salvation on a scrupulous fulfillment of it as a body of external precepts. But in the case of those who understood its real nature, who felt the inwardness and spirituality of the law, it served to deepen the sense of sin and to sharpen the conviction that salvation could be expected only from the grace of God . L. Berkhof, Systematic Theology (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans publishing co., 1938), 498–499.

F.F. Bruce: ...know their father's will...

The NT does not contain a detailed code of rules for the Christian. Codes of rules, as Paul explains elsewhere, are suited to the period of immaturity when the children of God are still under guardians; but children who have come to years of responsibility know their father’s will without having to be provided with a long list of “Do’s” and “Don’t’s.” What the NT does provide is those basic principles of Christian living which may be applied to varying situations of life as they arise. So, after answering the Corinthian Christians’ question about the eating of food that has been offered to idols, Paul sums up his advice in the words: “whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God” (1 Cor. 10:31). Phrases current in worship, like “to the glory of God” or (as here) “in the name of the Lord Jesus,” were given a practical relevance by being applied to the concerns of ordinary life. Bruce, F. F. (1984). The Epistles to the Colossians, to Philemon, and to the...

Search This Blog