Skip to main content

Leeman: No whiff of belonging before believing here.

By

One of the most vivid instances of Old Testament—New Testament continuity occurs when Paul reaches back to the cleanliness and ritual purity laws from the Pentateuch, holds them up in his hand, and says in essence to the Corinthians, “Church, be distinct like this!” He writes:

   Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers. For what partnership has righteousness with lawlessness? Or what fellowship has light with darkness? What accord has Christ with Belial? Or what portion does a believer share with an unbeliever? What agreement has the temple of God with idols? For we are the temple of the living God; as God said, “I will make my dwelling among them and walk among them, and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. Therefore go out from their midst, and be separate from them, says the Lord, and touch no unclean thing; then I will welcome you, and I will be a father to you, and you shall be sons and daughters to me, says the Lord Almighty.” Since we have these promises, beloved, let us cleanse ourselves from every defilement of body and spirit, bringing holiness to completion in the fear of God. (2 Cor. 6:14–7:1)

 Paul envisions quite the line distinguishing God’s people in Corinth from the larger Corinthian population. No partnership. No fellowship. No accord. No portion. No agreement. Instead, go out. Be separate. Cleanse yourselves. Bring holiness to completion.

 He is not talking geography; he is talking identity. He’s not telling them to refrain from befriending non-Christians or living among them. He’s affirming the church in its separate identity as the covenantal people among whom God dwells. They are the “temple of the living God.” Therefore, they must not enter into any partnership, fellowship, or accord with unbelievers that would tempt those unbelievers to think they belong to God, or tempt those believers to think they belong to the world. Yes, moral implications follow, but everything starts with an affirmation of their new identities. This New Testament church should be just as “set apart unto God,” as kosher-eating, Sabbath-keeping, Canaan-inhabiting, male-circumcising, ethnic Israel.

 We might wonder where this passage has disappeared to in the last few decades of evangelical ecclesiology. There’s no whiff of “belonging before believing” here. We use 2 Corinthians 6:14 to persuade the teens in the youth group not to date non-Christians at school, and that’s about it.

 It’s not as if Paul is unmindful of the points of discontinuity between the old covenant and the new. He has already spent an entire chapter explaining those discontinuities (2 Corinthians 3), followed by two more chapters emphasizing the outward missional thrust of the new covenant (2 Corinthians 4–5), which he concludes by calling himself an ambassador on behalf of a reconciling God (5:19–20). 

 He even uses the first half of chapter 6 to explain the extravagant lengths to which he would go to “make many rich” in the gospel (6:1–10). Then, in the second half of chapter 6, Paul tells the church to “go out” and “be separate.” Apparently, Paul sees no contradiction between the call to be an ambassador of reconciliation and the call to exclude unbelievers from the church. Mission and holiness are not opposed to one another; they work together. It’s no wonder that Jesus said that salt that loses its saltiness is useless, like light hidden under a bowl (Matt. 5:13–16).
Leeman, J. (2010). The Church and the Surprising Offense of God’s Love: Reintroducing the Doctrines of Church Membership and Discipline (pp. 255–256). Wheaton, IL: Crossway.


Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

John Stott on the "old man" and the "body ruled by sin" in Rom 6 v 6

By
  There are, in fact, two quite distinct ways in which the New Testament speaks of crucifixion in relation to holiness. The first is our death to sin through identification with Christ; the second is our death to self through imitation of Christ.  On the one hand, we have been crucified with Christ. But on the other we have crucified (decisively repudiated) our sinful nature with all its desires, so that every day we renew this attitude by taking up our cross and following Christ to crucifixion.  The first is a legal death, a death to the penalty of sin; the second is a moral death, a death to the power of sin.  The first belongs to the past, and is unique and unrepeatable; the second belongs to the present, and is repeatable, even continuous. I died to sin (in Christ) once; I die to self (like Christ) daily. It is with the first of these two deaths that Romans 6 is chiefly concerned, although the first is with a view to the second, and the second cannot take place w...
Post a Comment
Read more

Berkoff: "The law was not substituted for the promise; neither was faith supplanted by works. "

By
  The giving of the law did not effect a fundamental change in the religion of Israel, but merely introduced a change in its external form.  The law was not substituted for the promise; neither was faith supplanted by works.  Many of the Israelites, indeed, looked upon the law in a purely legalistic spirit and sought to base their claim to salvation on a scrupulous fulfillment of it as a body of external precepts.  But in the case of those who understood its real nature, who felt the inwardness and spirituality of the law, it served to deepen the sense of sin and to sharpen the conviction that salvation could be expected only from the grace of God . L. Berkhof, Systematic Theology (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans publishing co., 1938), 498–499.
Post a Comment
Read more

F.F. Bruce: ...know their father's will...

By
The NT does not contain a detailed code of rules for the Christian. Codes of rules, as Paul explains elsewhere, are suited to the period of immaturity when the children of God are still under guardians; but children who have come to years of responsibility know their father’s will without having to be provided with a long list of “Do’s” and “Don’t’s.” What the NT does provide is those basic principles of Christian living which may be applied to varying situations of life as they arise. So, after answering the Corinthian Christians’ question about the eating of food that has been offered to idols, Paul sums up his advice in the words: “whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God” (1 Cor. 10:31). Phrases current in worship, like “to the glory of God” or (as here) “in the name of the Lord Jesus,” were given a practical relevance by being applied to the concerns of ordinary life. Bruce, F. F. (1984). The Epistles to the Colossians, to Philemon, and to the...
Post a Comment
Read more