Skip to main content

Schreiner: Jesus’ authority pervades Mark’s Gospel.

 



Jesus’ authority pervades Mark’s Gospel. He calls disciples to follow him (1:16–20), casts out demons with a word, declares that the paralytic is forgiven of his sins (2:1–12), identifies himself as the end-time bridegroom (2:19–20), claims to be the Lord of the Sabbath (2:23–28), says that those who do God’s will are part of his family (3:31–35), stills a storm with his words (4:35–41), sends others out to preach the kingdom (6:7–13), feeds crowds of five thousand and four thousand (6:30–44; 8:1–10), functions as the interpreter of the law (7:1–23), demands that people follow him (1:17; 2:14; 8:34; 10:21), warns that those who are ashamed of him and his words will be punished (8:38), teaches that children should be received in his name (9:37), cleanses the temple (11:15–17), identifies himself as the last and the most important of God’s messengers (12:1–12), triumphs in controversy with religious leaders (11:27–12:44), predicts the destruction of the temple (13:1–37), calls on his disciples to bear witness to him before governmental authorities (13:9), claims to be the Son of God (14:61–62), and, most important of all, is raised from the dead (16:1–8).


Thomas R. Schreiner, The King in His Beauty: A Biblical Theology of the Old and New Testaments (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2013), 461.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

John Stott on the "old man" and the "body ruled by sin" in Rom 6 v 6

  There are, in fact, two quite distinct ways in which the New Testament speaks of crucifixion in relation to holiness. The first is our death to sin through identification with Christ; the second is our death to self through imitation of Christ.  On the one hand, we have been crucified with Christ. But on the other we have crucified (decisively repudiated) our sinful nature with all its desires, so that every day we renew this attitude by taking up our cross and following Christ to crucifixion.  The first is a legal death, a death to the penalty of sin; the second is a moral death, a death to the power of sin.  The first belongs to the past, and is unique and unrepeatable; the second belongs to the present, and is repeatable, even continuous. I died to sin (in Christ) once; I die to self (like Christ) daily. It is with the first of these two deaths that Romans 6 is chiefly concerned, although the first is with a view to the second, and the second cannot take place w...

Berkoff: "The law was not substituted for the promise; neither was faith supplanted by works. "

  The giving of the law did not effect a fundamental change in the religion of Israel, but merely introduced a change in its external form.  The law was not substituted for the promise; neither was faith supplanted by works.  Many of the Israelites, indeed, looked upon the law in a purely legalistic spirit and sought to base their claim to salvation on a scrupulous fulfillment of it as a body of external precepts.  But in the case of those who understood its real nature, who felt the inwardness and spirituality of the law, it served to deepen the sense of sin and to sharpen the conviction that salvation could be expected only from the grace of God . L. Berkhof, Systematic Theology (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans publishing co., 1938), 498–499.

F.F. Bruce: ...know their father's will...

The NT does not contain a detailed code of rules for the Christian. Codes of rules, as Paul explains elsewhere, are suited to the period of immaturity when the children of God are still under guardians; but children who have come to years of responsibility know their father’s will without having to be provided with a long list of “Do’s” and “Don’t’s.” What the NT does provide is those basic principles of Christian living which may be applied to varying situations of life as they arise. So, after answering the Corinthian Christians’ question about the eating of food that has been offered to idols, Paul sums up his advice in the words: “whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God” (1 Cor. 10:31). Phrases current in worship, like “to the glory of God” or (as here) “in the name of the Lord Jesus,” were given a practical relevance by being applied to the concerns of ordinary life. Bruce, F. F. (1984). The Epistles to the Colossians, to Philemon, and to the...