Skip to main content

What Pentateuch and Which Audience?

Sailhamer-
The Meaning of the Pentateuch
Introduction (pp. 24-27)

What Pentateuch?
· “I conclude that those last two chapters (Deut 33-34) were meant to provide an explanation of some of the major events in the Pentateuch at a late period in Israel’s history.”(24)

· “Our primary concern in the task of discovering the theology of the Pentateuch is the need to focus on the Pentateuch now in our Bible, that is the ‘canonical Pentateuch.’ ” (24,25)

The audience of the Pentateuch
· “…one must distinguish the audience in the Pentateuch and the audience of the Pentateuch.” (25)

· “…the Pentateuch itself was not written to teach Israel the law. The Pentateuch was addressed to a people living under the law (Deut 30:1-2; Ezra 7:6-10) and failing at every opportunity (Neh 9:33). The Pentateuch looks beyond the law of God to his grace. The purpose of the Pentateuch is to teach its readers about faith and hope in the new covenant (Deut 30:6). (26)

· “Nothing was inherently wrong with the Sinai covenant, but something was fundamentally wrong with Israel’s heart: it needed cleansing and filling with God’s love (Deut 30:6). … The NT contrasted the failure of the Sinai covenant with the new covenant, which succeeded in Christ.” (27)

· “The Pentateuch was written to Israel at a later time, certainly only after Israel’s failures that it records. It was given to tell Israel that the Sinai covenant had failed. As the prophet Hosea saw, the Pentateuch is primarily not about a wedding, but a divorce.” (27)

· “In the Pentateuch we are confronted with a call to a new covenant not to the old. In that respect, the Pentateuch is quite close in the meaning to NT book of Galatians.” (27)

· A “book with laws” is not necessarily a ‘book of law.’ (27)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Berkoff: "The law was not substituted for the promise; neither was faith supplanted by works. "

  The giving of the law did not effect a fundamental change in the religion of Israel, but merely introduced a change in its external form.  The law was not substituted for the promise; neither was faith supplanted by works.  Many of the Israelites, indeed, looked upon the law in a purely legalistic spirit and sought to base their claim to salvation on a scrupulous fulfillment of it as a body of external precepts.  But in the case of those who understood its real nature, who felt the inwardness and spirituality of the law, it served to deepen the sense of sin and to sharpen the conviction that salvation could be expected only from the grace of God . L. Berkhof, Systematic Theology (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans publishing co., 1938), 498–499.

John Stott on the "old man" and the "body ruled by sin" in Rom 6 v 6

  There are, in fact, two quite distinct ways in which the New Testament speaks of crucifixion in relation to holiness. The first is our death to sin through identification with Christ; the second is our death to self through imitation of Christ.  On the one hand, we have been crucified with Christ. But on the other we have crucified (decisively repudiated) our sinful nature with all its desires, so that every day we renew this attitude by taking up our cross and following Christ to crucifixion.  The first is a legal death, a death to the penalty of sin; the second is a moral death, a death to the power of sin.  The first belongs to the past, and is unique and unrepeatable; the second belongs to the present, and is repeatable, even continuous. I died to sin (in Christ) once; I die to self (like Christ) daily. It is with the first of these two deaths that Romans 6 is chiefly concerned, although the first is with a view to the second, and the second cannot take place w...

F.F. Bruce: ...know their father's will...

The NT does not contain a detailed code of rules for the Christian. Codes of rules, as Paul explains elsewhere, are suited to the period of immaturity when the children of God are still under guardians; but children who have come to years of responsibility know their father’s will without having to be provided with a long list of “Do’s” and “Don’t’s.” What the NT does provide is those basic principles of Christian living which may be applied to varying situations of life as they arise. So, after answering the Corinthian Christians’ question about the eating of food that has been offered to idols, Paul sums up his advice in the words: “whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God” (1 Cor. 10:31). Phrases current in worship, like “to the glory of God” or (as here) “in the name of the Lord Jesus,” were given a practical relevance by being applied to the concerns of ordinary life. Bruce, F. F. (1984). The Epistles to the Colossians, to Philemon, and to the...