Horton: God is three persons.

The early Christians did not arrive at the doctrine of the Trinity by theological speculation. Like the gospel itself, the New Testament brings to clear expression that revelation of the Trinity that was more obscurely present all along in the Old Testament. Jesus is the Son who existed with the Father before the ages and was made human “when the set time had fully come” (Gal 4:4; cf. Rom 1:1–5).

With intentional echoes of Genesis 1, John 1 begins, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning” (vv. 1–2). Here the Son is distinct from the Father. There are two persons, yet the Son is identified as God along with the Father. He is “the one and only Son, who came from the Father” (v. 14) and “is himself God and is in closest relationship with the Father” (v. 18).

Paul follows the same formula. Jesus Christ is “the image of the invisible God. . . . For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together” (Col 1:15–17).

The Father, the Son, and the Spirit were all involved in creation. Yet each was involved in a different way. We also see the doctrine of the Trinity arising out of the drama of Jesus’s baptism (Matt 3:13–17; Mark 1:9–11; Luke 3:21–22; John 1:32–34). In that story we find the Father who speaks (“This is my Son, whom I love”), the beloved Son who is baptized, and the Spirit hovering above Jesus as he did over the waters in creation.

The doctrine arose out of the drama of redemption. God came down to us, and he was the Son who existed eternally with the Father. Now he is one of us: a human being, though still God. Then there is the Holy Spirit, who not only descended at Jesus’s baptism but also at Pentecost.

People experienced Jesus as God in his life, death, and resurrection. Then they came to know the Holy Spirit as God when he was poured out at Pentecost. Whatever views you have had of God have to catch up with the story. God is three persons.

Michael Horton, Core Christianity: Finding Yourself in God’s Story (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2016).

Comments

John Stott on the "old man" and the "body ruled by sin" in Rom 6 v 6

There are, in fact, two quite distinct ways in which the New Testament speaks of crucifixion in relation to holiness. The first is our death to sin through identification with Christ; the second is our death to self through imitation of Christ. On the one hand, we have been crucified with Christ. But on the other we have crucified (decisively repudiated) our sinful nature with all its desires, so that every day we renew this attitude by taking up our cross and following Christ to crucifixion. The first is a legal death, a death to the penalty of sin; the second is a moral death, a death to the power of sin. The first belongs to the past, and is unique and unrepeatable; the second belongs to the present, and is repeatable, even continuous. I died to sin (in Christ) once; I die to self (like Christ) daily. It is with the first of these two deaths that Romans 6 is chiefly concerned, although the first is with a view to the second, and the second cannot take place w...

Boice: “... the federal way of dealing with us was actually the fairest and kindest of all the ways God could have operated. ”

Adam had been appointed by God to be the representative of the race so that if he stood, we too would stand, and if he fell, we would fall with him. Adam did fall, as we know. So death passed upon everyone. “But isn’t that terribly unfair?” someone protests. “Isn’t it cruel for God to act in this fashion?” ... the federal way of dealing with us was actually the fairest and kindest of all the ways God could have operated. Besides, it was the only way it would later be possible for God to save us once we had sinned. In other words, federalism is actually a proof of God’s grace, which is the point the passage comes to (vv. 15 ff.). It was gracious to Adam first of all. Why? Because it was a deterrent to his sin. God must have explained to Adam that he was to represent his posterity. That might have restrained him from sinning. A father who might be tempted to steal his employer’s funds (and would if only he himself were involved), might well decide not to do it if he kne...

Repackaging the gospel? It's more like obscuring the gospel!

Preface : I recognize this post may make me unpopular with some, but I think it is an important issue to blog about here. I’ve had time to reflect on this video and in my opinion, I think what is in this video raises some questions. This gentleman featured below is slotted to speak at the SBC's 2020 Pastors' Conference and it prompted me to think more about this illustration. I want to note that I don't know him and I have no personal issue with him. I assume he is a brother in the LORD. Having said that, I see some significant issues here that relate to this type of preaching being clear on the gospel of Jesus Christ. In fact, it appears to be obscuring it in my observation. Concern: Should the SBC or churches, in general, be in the habit of holding this up as a good and healthy example? Let's think about it some together. (Watch this clip below here first.) Context: The clip was posted to stand on its own a...

Search This Blog