Skip to main content

Beale: Why Jesus reflects both the OT figures of Adam and Israel

By


The reason why Jesus reflects both the OT figures of Adam and Israel is, as we observed earlier, that Israel and its patriarchs were given the same commission as was Adam in Gen. 1:26–28. Consequently, it is not an overstatement to understand Israel as a corporate Adam who had failed in its “garden of Eden,” in much the same way as its primal father had failed in the first garden. (Note again OT texts where Israel’s promised land is called the “garden of Eden” (Gen. 13:10; Isa. 51:3; Ezek. 36:35; Joel 2:3).

For these reasons, we recall once again that one of the reasons why Jesus is called “Son of God” is that this was a name for the first Adam (Luke 3:38; cf. Gen. 5:1–3) and for Israel (Exod. 4:22; Hos. 11:1). Recall yet again also that the divine image that Adam was to reflect was expressed more in functional than in ontological terms: Adam was to reflect God’s actions in Gen. 1 of subduing and ruling over creation, creating, and filling the world with his creation. Accordingly, Adam was to “rule and subdue,” “be fruitful and multiply” (i.e., increase the human progeny of the creation), and “fill the earth” with image-bearers who reflect the divine glory. We even saw that the language of “sonship” in Gen. 5:1–3 was essentially descriptive of someone who was in the “likeness” and “image” of his father, so that Adam himself was to be considered a “son” of God because he too was created in the “image” and “likeness” of God (Gen. 1:26; 5:1).

Likewise, the expression “Son of Man” from Dan. 7:13 refers to end-time Israel and its representative king as the son of Adam who is sovereign over beasts (recall that the Son of Man takes over the kingdoms of former evil empires portrayed as beasts). Understandably, against this background, it is natural that “Son of Man” became one of Jesus’s favorite ways to refer to himself.

Thus, Jesus Christ is the son of Adam, or the “Son of Man,” who has begun to do what the first Adam did not do and to inherit what the first Adam did not inherit, including an end-time glory that was a consummate reflection of God’s image. But he is also the true, end-time Israel, to which the applications of the Dan. 7 Son of Man to Jesus also point strongly, since the Adamic language of “Son of Man [Adam]” is interpreted in Dan. 7 itself first to be the saints of Israel. However, as we saw earlier in this chapter, a careful reading of Dan. 7:13 reveals that the Son of Man is also an individual divine king who corporately represents Israel.

We also saw earlier in this chapter and in chapter 2 that Dan. 7 has multiple allusions to Gen. 1, which enforces the notion of an Adamic background. In this regard, at the risk of being overly repetitive, I want to underscore once again that since the nation Israel bore the mantle of Adam (the Gen. 1:28 commission was repeatedly applied to Israel), it was considered to be a corporate Adam and was also functionally to reflect God’s image (see chap. 2). This identification is a crucial linchpin for the biblical-theological conclusions in this chapter and in others to come. Hence, Jesus’s two roles as the last Adam and true Israel are two sides of one redemptive-historical coin.

Therefore, Jesus came as the end-time Adamic Son of God, representing corporate Israel, and in doing so he was doing what the first Adam should have done in completely obeying God. And in this, he was inaugurating the kingdom of the new creation. And in doing so, he was restoring the functional image of God for those whom he represented. In that Jesus himself was the model Adam, and hence the perfect image of God as the first Adam should have been, all those who trust in and follow Jesus are identified with him as the end-time royal Adam and eschatological image of God.


Beale, G. K. (2011). A New Testament Biblical Theology: The Unfolding of the Old Testament in the New (pp. 428–429). Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Repackaging the gospel? It's more like obscuring the gospel!

By
Preface : I recognize this post may make me unpopular with some, but I think it is an important issue to blog about here.  I’ve had time to reflect on this video and in my opinion, I think what is in this video raises some questions.  This gentleman featured below is slotted to speak at the SBC's 2020 Pastors' Conference and it prompted me to think more about this illustration.  I want to note that I don't know him and I have no personal issue with him.   I assume he is a brother in the LORD.  Having said that, I see some significant issues here that relate to this type of preaching being clear on the gospel of Jesus Christ. In fact, it appears to be obscuring it in my observation. Concern:  Should the SBC or churches, in general, be in the habit of holding this up as a  good and healthy example?  Let's think about it some together.  (Watch this clip below here first.) Context:  The clip was posted to stand on its own as if it were wise and sound on it
2 comments
Read more

Smith: "Many people believe God opens the door of salvation and then stands back...".

By
  Jonah 2:9 “Salvation belongs to the LORD!”  God’s dramatic intervention in the life of Jonah is full of hope—not only for those who seek God, but also for those who, like Jonah, have determined to shut him out.  Many people believe God opens the door of salvation and then stands back, leaving it up to us to decide if we want to come in.   But if God made salvation possible and then stepped back, refusing to interfere with our choice, then the entire life of believers would be about us—our believing, our serving, our following, and our choices to live a good life.  In the case of Jonah, imprisoned in the whale’s belly, God was claiming someone who was quite incapable of performing any redeeming work to compensate for his sin. God was not relying on Jonah to save Jonah. The message remains the same for each of us today: if you have trusted God for salvation, he has done more than simply make salvation possible; he has actually saved you. Colin Smith, “Jonah,” in Gospel Transformation B
Post a Comment
Read more

Men stirred, boys exhorted, and Jesus exalted!

By
  Neh 8 v 13 (CSB)  13 On the second day, the family heads of all the people, along with the priests and Levites, assembled before the scribe Ezra to study the words of the law.  Notice the feel of the scene.       After that long day in the Word, it appears that the women and children were, understandably, exhausted and urged to stay home on this occasion.   And, among the men, there is a growing interest of “What else are we missing right now as it pertains to obeying God's Word?”.  So clear is the fact that the family heads, the men, came back to get more. The real sense of enthusiasm starts with the men here.  If you were an able-bodied man here, you stayed behind to get instructions so that you might be a good instructor at home. The text says these men came together  to study the words of the law .  That means to  give attention to and ponder.  This is the process of thinking through complex things, resulting in wise dealing and the use of good practical common sense. Here in
Post a Comment
Read more