Sailhamer: His instruction would be sweet to them and satisfy their thirst.

V. The Wilderness Wanderings (15:22-18:27)

A. God's Provision for Israel in the Desert (15:22-27)
After the destruction of the pharaoh's army in the sea, the Israelites continued their journey eastward into the Desert of Shur. Shur was a large semi-desert region east of the Egyptian border frontier. After three days without finding water, they arrived at Marah. There the Lord began to provide for the people, and the people learned to depend on his provision.

There is an important narrative lesson in the incident of the bitter waters. When the people were helpless and thirsty, Moses called out to the Lord for help. The Lord answered Moses by giving him an “instruction” on how to make the water sweet. When they followed the “instruction,” the water became sweet and their thirst was satisfied (v.25). In the Hebrew text, the word “instruction” means divine instruction. There is then a lesson about God's instructions to Israel in this incident: God's people must “listen carefully to the voice of the LORD [their] God” (v.26). His instruction would be sweet to them and satisfy their thirst.

The mention of “a decree and a law” (v.25b) for Israel and of Israel's being called upon to listen to the Lord's “commands” and “decrees” before the time of the giving of the Law at Sinai raises many questions. Already at this stage in their journey God had made known his will to the Israelites in concrete laws, such as the commands for keeping the Sabbath and those necessary for the administration of justice. We may posit a distinction between God's initial giving of the law to Israel, which was not too burdensome to bear, and God's giving of the detailed laws at Sinai after the incident of the Golden Calf (ch. 32). The Law was originally intended to teach God's people what was “right in his eyes” (15:26). After the failure of the people in the incident of the golden calf, however, more stringent measures were taken to keep the people from falling away into idolatry. Paul appears to have this view of the secondary nature of the Mosaic law in Gal 3:19, where he says that the Mosaic law “was added because of the transgressions.”

Having learned the lesson of dependence on God and listening to his voice, the people moved on to Elim where they found abundant water and nourishment (15:27).

Sailhamer, John (1994) NIV Compact Commentary (pp. 81-82) Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.

Comments

John Stott on the "old man" and the "body ruled by sin" in Rom 6 v 6

There are, in fact, two quite distinct ways in which the New Testament speaks of crucifixion in relation to holiness. The first is our death to sin through identification with Christ; the second is our death to self through imitation of Christ. On the one hand, we have been crucified with Christ. But on the other we have crucified (decisively repudiated) our sinful nature with all its desires, so that every day we renew this attitude by taking up our cross and following Christ to crucifixion. The first is a legal death, a death to the penalty of sin; the second is a moral death, a death to the power of sin. The first belongs to the past, and is unique and unrepeatable; the second belongs to the present, and is repeatable, even continuous. I died to sin (in Christ) once; I die to self (like Christ) daily. It is with the first of these two deaths that Romans 6 is chiefly concerned, although the first is with a view to the second, and the second cannot take place w...

Boice: “... the federal way of dealing with us was actually the fairest and kindest of all the ways God could have operated. ”

Adam had been appointed by God to be the representative of the race so that if he stood, we too would stand, and if he fell, we would fall with him. Adam did fall, as we know. So death passed upon everyone. “But isn’t that terribly unfair?” someone protests. “Isn’t it cruel for God to act in this fashion?” ... the federal way of dealing with us was actually the fairest and kindest of all the ways God could have operated. Besides, it was the only way it would later be possible for God to save us once we had sinned. In other words, federalism is actually a proof of God’s grace, which is the point the passage comes to (vv. 15 ff.). It was gracious to Adam first of all. Why? Because it was a deterrent to his sin. God must have explained to Adam that he was to represent his posterity. That might have restrained him from sinning. A father who might be tempted to steal his employer’s funds (and would if only he himself were involved), might well decide not to do it if he kne...

Repackaging the gospel? It's more like obscuring the gospel!

Preface : I recognize this post may make me unpopular with some, but I think it is an important issue to blog about here. I’ve had time to reflect on this video and in my opinion, I think what is in this video raises some questions. This gentleman featured below is slotted to speak at the SBC's 2020 Pastors' Conference and it prompted me to think more about this illustration. I want to note that I don't know him and I have no personal issue with him. I assume he is a brother in the LORD. Having said that, I see some significant issues here that relate to this type of preaching being clear on the gospel of Jesus Christ. In fact, it appears to be obscuring it in my observation. Concern: Should the SBC or churches, in general, be in the habit of holding this up as a good and healthy example? Let's think about it some together. (Watch this clip below here first.) Context: The clip was posted to stand on its own a...

Search This Blog