Skip to main content

Schreiner: Jesus’ taking upon himself the role of a servant


We also have an allusion to Jesus’ death in the washing of the disciples’ feet (John 13:1–17). Jesus’ love to the end signified his willingness to die for his disciples (John 13:1). The washing represents the cleansing effected by Jesus’ death. 

Hence, if Peter refused to be washed, he had “no share” (meros) with Jesus (John 13:8); that is, he has no inheritance among God’s people. Only those who are washed by Jesus enjoy forgiveness of sins. Only one washing is needed because Jesus’ death is efficacious (John 13:10), and the need for the disciples to be washed at this juncture of Jesus’ ministry demonstrates that they still need his cleansing death. Jesus, of course, did not think that physical washing itself was sufficient to grant cleansing. He cleaned Judas’s feet, and yet Judas was not truly clean (John 13:11). Judas did not genuinely belong among those whose sins were forgiven. 

Jesus’ taking upon himself the role of a servant in washing the disciples’ feet points forward to his servant role on the cross, where he washed his own by dying for sin and granting cleansing to those who trust in him. All those who have received Jesus’ gracious work and word are genuinely clean (John 15:3)

Schreiner, T. R. (2008). New Testament theology: magnifying God in Christ (pp. 285–286). Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Berkoff: "The law was not substituted for the promise; neither was faith supplanted by works. "

  The giving of the law did not effect a fundamental change in the religion of Israel, but merely introduced a change in its external form.  The law was not substituted for the promise; neither was faith supplanted by works.  Many of the Israelites, indeed, looked upon the law in a purely legalistic spirit and sought to base their claim to salvation on a scrupulous fulfillment of it as a body of external precepts.  But in the case of those who understood its real nature, who felt the inwardness and spirituality of the law, it served to deepen the sense of sin and to sharpen the conviction that salvation could be expected only from the grace of God . L. Berkhof, Systematic Theology (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans publishing co., 1938), 498–499.

John Stott on the "old man" and the "body ruled by sin" in Rom 6 v 6

  There are, in fact, two quite distinct ways in which the New Testament speaks of crucifixion in relation to holiness. The first is our death to sin through identification with Christ; the second is our death to self through imitation of Christ.  On the one hand, we have been crucified with Christ. But on the other we have crucified (decisively repudiated) our sinful nature with all its desires, so that every day we renew this attitude by taking up our cross and following Christ to crucifixion.  The first is a legal death, a death to the penalty of sin; the second is a moral death, a death to the power of sin.  The first belongs to the past, and is unique and unrepeatable; the second belongs to the present, and is repeatable, even continuous. I died to sin (in Christ) once; I die to self (like Christ) daily. It is with the first of these two deaths that Romans 6 is chiefly concerned, although the first is with a view to the second, and the second cannot take place w...

F.F. Bruce: ...know their father's will...

The NT does not contain a detailed code of rules for the Christian. Codes of rules, as Paul explains elsewhere, are suited to the period of immaturity when the children of God are still under guardians; but children who have come to years of responsibility know their father’s will without having to be provided with a long list of “Do’s” and “Don’t’s.” What the NT does provide is those basic principles of Christian living which may be applied to varying situations of life as they arise. So, after answering the Corinthian Christians’ question about the eating of food that has been offered to idols, Paul sums up his advice in the words: “whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God” (1 Cor. 10:31). Phrases current in worship, like “to the glory of God” or (as here) “in the name of the Lord Jesus,” were given a practical relevance by being applied to the concerns of ordinary life. Bruce, F. F. (1984). The Epistles to the Colossians, to Philemon, and to the...