Skip to main content

DeYoung: Because someone turned on the lights.



In John 16:8 Jesus says he will send the Spirit to convict the world concerning sin, righteousness, and judgment. Elsewhere in John the word “convict” is translated “exposed” (John 3:20). Jesus is saying the Spirit will expose the world’s rebellion. That is part of Spirit-powered sanctification. He turns on the lights so we can see what we have been blind to.


Have you ever been in a room in your house, or in the attic or garage, and you flip on the light switch and the floor moves? Not a good feeling. No one likes to be surprised by little rodents or insects or snakes scurrying beneath you. Why does that happen? Why do they run away so vigorously? Because someone turned on the lights. They want to be in the dark. They want to be hidden. They have no desire to be out in the open. Sin is like that too. People love darkness rather than light because their deeds are evil (John 3:19). This is what happens when you really preach with conviction and when God works in your life with conviction. Rats of sin are going to scurry. Cockroaches are going to run up the walls and look for a dark place to hide. Sin does not want to be in the light. But it is the mercy of God to shine a spotlight nonetheless. That is part of what you are trying to do when you teach and preach. You are shining a giant spotlight on sin. 

Here is a prayer that God has always answered in my life—sometimes a week later, sometimes a day later, sometimes five minutes later—“Lord, show me my sin.” He will always answer that prayer. I’ve prayed it before saying, “God, I don’t know if I mean it, but I want to mean it, so I’m praying it again. Please show me my sin.” Ask him to turn the lights on. The Spirit exposes sin.


Leeman, J., Mohler, A., Jr, Anyabwile, T., Platt, D., DeYoung, K., Dever, M., … Mohler, R. A., Jr. (2014). The underestimated gospel. Nashville: B&H.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

John Stott on the "old man" and the "body ruled by sin" in Rom 6 v 6

  There are, in fact, two quite distinct ways in which the New Testament speaks of crucifixion in relation to holiness. The first is our death to sin through identification with Christ; the second is our death to self through imitation of Christ.  On the one hand, we have been crucified with Christ. But on the other we have crucified (decisively repudiated) our sinful nature with all its desires, so that every day we renew this attitude by taking up our cross and following Christ to crucifixion.  The first is a legal death, a death to the penalty of sin; the second is a moral death, a death to the power of sin.  The first belongs to the past, and is unique and unrepeatable; the second belongs to the present, and is repeatable, even continuous. I died to sin (in Christ) once; I die to self (like Christ) daily. It is with the first of these two deaths that Romans 6 is chiefly concerned, although the first is with a view to the second, and the second cannot take place w...

Boice: “... the federal way of dealing with us was actually the fairest and kindest of all the ways God could have operated. ”

  Adam had been appointed by God to be the representative of the race so that if he stood, we too would stand, and if he fell, we would fall with him. Adam did fall, as we know.  So death passed upon everyone. “But isn’t that terribly unfair?” someone protests. “Isn’t it cruel for God to act in this fashion?” ... the federal way of dealing with us was actually the fairest and kindest of all the ways God could have operated.  Besides, it was the only way it would later be possible for God to save us once we had sinned. In other words, federalism is actually a proof of God’s grace, which is the point the passage comes to (vv. 15 ff.). It was gracious to Adam first of all. Why? Because it was a deterrent to his sin. God must have explained to Adam that he was to represent his posterity. That might have restrained him from sinning. A father who might be tempted to steal his employer’s funds (and would if only he himself were involved), might well decide not to do it if he kne...

Repackaging the gospel? It's more like obscuring the gospel!

Preface : I recognize this post may make me unpopular with some, but I think it is an important issue to blog about here.  I’ve had time to reflect on this video and in my opinion, I think what is in this video raises some questions.  This gentleman featured below is slotted to speak at the SBC's 2020 Pastors' Conference and it prompted me to think more about this illustration.  I want to note that I don't know him and I have no personal issue with him.   I assume he is a brother in the LORD.  Having said that, I see some significant issues here that relate to this type of preaching being clear on the gospel of Jesus Christ. In fact, it appears to be obscuring it in my observation. Concern:  Should the SBC or churches, in general, be in the habit of holding this up as a  good and healthy example?  Let's think about it some together.  (Watch this clip below here first.) Context:  The clip was posted to stand on its own a...