Michael Lawrence: The Roman Catholic Church began to teach...

...Christ was forsaken by God. From the beginning of Christianity many have tried to save Christ from the horror of God-forsakenness on the cross.

In the early centuries of the church, Docetists of various forms and types claimed that Christ’s sufferings weren’t real but only appeared to be real. Hence, they were called “Docetists,” doke being the Greek word for “appearance.” Others claimed that it wasn’t really Jesus who died on the cross but that, at the last second, God rescued Jesus, whom he loved, and put someone else there, the most popular substitute being Judas. This idea especially was later picked up by Islam and popularized in the Muslim world.

By the Middle Ages the rescue attempts had taken on more sophisticated forms. The Roman Catholic Church began to teach that though Christ did suffer God’s forsaking wrath on the cross, he did so only in his human nature, not in his divine nature as the God-man. Quite naturally this led to a focus and an emphasis on the physical sufferings of Jesus the man, reflected in the piety of the crucifix, with the body of Christ still on the cross, and of the mass, in which the body of Christ is supposedly crushed again in our mouths.

... To begin with, the God-forsakenness that Christ experienced on the cross is not merely the absence of God’s favor and blessing, though it is that. It is also the positive infliction of God’s wrath for sin. On the cross, Jesus Christ bore the penalty for sin. This is extraordinary, of course, for he had no sin of his own. The sin that he bore was the sin of others, the sin of those he had come to save. Yet God made him who had no sin to be sin (2 Cor. 5:21); he endured a cursed death because God had made him to become a curse (Gal. 3:13). There on the cross, bearing sin, Christ endured the wrath of God that sin deserves. God’s wrath at that point was not personal anger. He was not angry at Jesus. He was angry at sin, and Jesus bore it. Christ experienced a judicial wrath.

Dever, M., & Lawrence, M. (2010). It Is Well: Expositions on Substitutionary Atonement (pp. 84–87). Wheaton, IL: Crossway.

Comments

John Stott on the "old man" and the "body ruled by sin" in Rom 6 v 6

There are, in fact, two quite distinct ways in which the New Testament speaks of crucifixion in relation to holiness. The first is our death to sin through identification with Christ; the second is our death to self through imitation of Christ. On the one hand, we have been crucified with Christ. But on the other we have crucified (decisively repudiated) our sinful nature with all its desires, so that every day we renew this attitude by taking up our cross and following Christ to crucifixion. The first is a legal death, a death to the penalty of sin; the second is a moral death, a death to the power of sin. The first belongs to the past, and is unique and unrepeatable; the second belongs to the present, and is repeatable, even continuous. I died to sin (in Christ) once; I die to self (like Christ) daily. It is with the first of these two deaths that Romans 6 is chiefly concerned, although the first is with a view to the second, and the second cannot take place w...

Berkoff: "The law was not substituted for the promise; neither was faith supplanted by works. "

The giving of the law did not effect a fundamental change in the religion of Israel, but merely introduced a change in its external form. The law was not substituted for the promise; neither was faith supplanted by works. Many of the Israelites, indeed, looked upon the law in a purely legalistic spirit and sought to base their claim to salvation on a scrupulous fulfillment of it as a body of external precepts. But in the case of those who understood its real nature, who felt the inwardness and spirituality of the law, it served to deepen the sense of sin and to sharpen the conviction that salvation could be expected only from the grace of God . L. Berkhof, Systematic Theology (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans publishing co., 1938), 498–499.

F.F. Bruce: ...know their father's will...

The NT does not contain a detailed code of rules for the Christian. Codes of rules, as Paul explains elsewhere, are suited to the period of immaturity when the children of God are still under guardians; but children who have come to years of responsibility know their father’s will without having to be provided with a long list of “Do’s” and “Don’t’s.” What the NT does provide is those basic principles of Christian living which may be applied to varying situations of life as they arise. So, after answering the Corinthian Christians’ question about the eating of food that has been offered to idols, Paul sums up his advice in the words: “whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God” (1 Cor. 10:31). Phrases current in worship, like “to the glory of God” or (as here) “in the name of the Lord Jesus,” were given a practical relevance by being applied to the concerns of ordinary life. Bruce, F. F. (1984). The Epistles to the Colossians, to Philemon, and to the...

Search This Blog