Skip to main content

Lawrence: Amuse the dying or Raise the dead



God’s words are not just true, they are effectual. God speaking is God acting.

    •      In Genesis 1, the void could not resist him.
    •      In Ezekiel 37, when Ezekiel calls out to the valley of the dry bones with God’s Word and Spirit, the bones didn’t say to Ezekiel, “We don’t want to get up.”
    •      In John 11, when Jesus calls out to the corpse of Lazarus, Lazarus didn’t say to Jesus, “Not now, ask me again next year.” No, when the voice of God rings out in gracious, creative power, not even death or unbelief can resist him.

God’s voice is irresistible because it is powerful and because it is the voice of love.
Do you see a typological pattern developing here? Could it be that God is doing things among physical realities to teach us something about spiritual realities? If God’s Word effectually creates every time, what do you think happens when Jesus calls out to sinners to come to him in repentance and faith? Does his Word all of a sudden become less effective, less powerful, just because he’s talking to us?

Also, if God’s Word effectually creates every time—“my word will not return back to me void,” he says in Isaiah 55:11—what do you think churches should do when they gather? Should they concentrate on entertainment or on preaching the Word?

I suppose it depends on whether they want a ministry designed to amuse the dying or a ministry aimed at raising the dead.


Lawrence, M. (2010). Biblical Theology in the Life of the Church: A Guide for Ministry (pp. 123–124). Wheaton, IL: Crossway.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

John Stott on the "old man" and the "body ruled by sin" in Rom 6 v 6

  There are, in fact, two quite distinct ways in which the New Testament speaks of crucifixion in relation to holiness. The first is our death to sin through identification with Christ; the second is our death to self through imitation of Christ.  On the one hand, we have been crucified with Christ. But on the other we have crucified (decisively repudiated) our sinful nature with all its desires, so that every day we renew this attitude by taking up our cross and following Christ to crucifixion.  The first is a legal death, a death to the penalty of sin; the second is a moral death, a death to the power of sin.  The first belongs to the past, and is unique and unrepeatable; the second belongs to the present, and is repeatable, even continuous. I died to sin (in Christ) once; I die to self (like Christ) daily. It is with the first of these two deaths that Romans 6 is chiefly concerned, although the first is with a view to the second, and the second cannot take place w...

Berkoff: "The law was not substituted for the promise; neither was faith supplanted by works. "

  The giving of the law did not effect a fundamental change in the religion of Israel, but merely introduced a change in its external form.  The law was not substituted for the promise; neither was faith supplanted by works.  Many of the Israelites, indeed, looked upon the law in a purely legalistic spirit and sought to base their claim to salvation on a scrupulous fulfillment of it as a body of external precepts.  But in the case of those who understood its real nature, who felt the inwardness and spirituality of the law, it served to deepen the sense of sin and to sharpen the conviction that salvation could be expected only from the grace of God . L. Berkhof, Systematic Theology (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans publishing co., 1938), 498–499.

F.F. Bruce: ...know their father's will...

The NT does not contain a detailed code of rules for the Christian. Codes of rules, as Paul explains elsewhere, are suited to the period of immaturity when the children of God are still under guardians; but children who have come to years of responsibility know their father’s will without having to be provided with a long list of “Do’s” and “Don’t’s.” What the NT does provide is those basic principles of Christian living which may be applied to varying situations of life as they arise. So, after answering the Corinthian Christians’ question about the eating of food that has been offered to idols, Paul sums up his advice in the words: “whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God” (1 Cor. 10:31). Phrases current in worship, like “to the glory of God” or (as here) “in the name of the Lord Jesus,” were given a practical relevance by being applied to the concerns of ordinary life. Bruce, F. F. (1984). The Epistles to the Colossians, to Philemon, and to the...